digital pity: Saturday, June 09, 2007 at 11:28 PM by Randy
Dear LazyWeb: should I be running my 500GB SATA-II drive in IDE or AHCI mode?
FWIW, I installed with IDE. Found a registry setting that allows you to switch to AHCI mode after installing (HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\msachi\Start needs to be 0 for AHCI to be active, it seems) and I already tried that out... I still have my SATA DVD drive showing up there (some people lost theirs when they tried this) so that's a non-issue.
My reason for asking is that I've read that AHCI mode is supposed to be better yet I think IDE mode was faster - or at least I'm seeing AHCI take longer on boot and then hiccup a little bit while booting...
I think the biggest thing you get with AHCI is the ability to hotswap the hard drive. That's much more useful with, say, an eSATA drive or a drive that is not your primary system drive than for your system drive. And I think some optical drives have problems with AHCI mode, but then some motherboards let you set AHCI/IDE mode separately on each SATA connector.
The eSATA drive is controlled by a different controller (the J-something rather than the Intel ICH9 controller) so that shouldn't be impacted. And the optical drive shows up fine so that's OK.
My biggest concern is that of backup/restore stuff. I know that if I installed Windows with the drive set as AHCI I would have had to supply a drive during the install via a floppy disk: there's no floppy disk in my PC :) I have a USB floppy drive but who knows if that'll work. I guess if I had a HDD failure and had to restore it, I could pick up a floppy for exactly that purpose, but even so. If the only thing I get is hotswapping drives that are internal, maybe I'll flip flop back to IDE and not have to worry about it.
The views expressed on this web site are mine, and mine alone. They do not reflect the views of anyone else, including my employer, and they are not endorsed or approved by anyone other than myself: my opinions are of my own design.